.
Feedback

Deep and Substantive Conversation: A Proven Spirit Booster

Study shows that adding five substantive conversations to your weekly social calendar could boost your spirits dramatically

It's said that "the best things in life are free" -- but, is it true?

As we know, many days just fly by in a blur as we move from task to task - perhaps grabbing a quick coffee on the run  -  as we give a friend or neighbor a quick hello before whizzing on to the next task. Do this. Don't forget that. Call so-and-so. Did I answer his email?

Rush. Rush. Rush. Go. Go. Go. Do. Do. Do

Dinner time conversation often includes a litany of things we did -- or didn't -- achieve that day. Did you pick up the dry cleaning? What about the oil change? The cycle of the never ending 'to do list' re-emerges day after day. Then, as the day draws to a close we look back in review and conclude that 'we really didn't accomplish that  much'. Oh irony!

Who would ever declare themselves 'happier' as a result of being stuck in rush hour traffic, running errands, meeting deadlines, answering emails and just catching a quick glimpse and exchanging small talk with those nearest and dearest?

What is it that really which brings happiness, meaning and satisfaction to our lives?

Curiously, a 'happiness' study reveals that those who spend more time engaged in substantive conversation report greater happiness than those who spend more of their time conversing superficially.

According to the study Eavesdropping on Happiness: Well-Being Is Related to Having Less Small Talk and More Substantive Conversations, those who report the greatest level of happiness not only lead lives which are more social than solitary but also engage in face-to-face communications which are "conversationally deep rather than superficial."[1]

Researcher and psychologist Mathias Mehl of University of Arizona reports:

"...the happiest [people]....[have] twice as many substantive conversations, and only one-third of the amount of small talk as the unhappiest. Almost every other conversation the happiest person had — 45.9 percent of the day’s conversations — were substantive, while only 21.8 percent of the unhappiest person’s conversations were substantive. Small talk made up only 10 percent of the happiest person’s conversations, while it made up almost three times as much –- or 28.3 percent –- of the unhappiest person’s conversations."[2]

The happiest subjects spent 70 percent more time talking than the unhappiest subjects, which suggests that “the mere time a person spends in the presence of others is a good predictor of the person’s level of happines.[3]

What do you think your 'small-talk to deep-conversation ratio' might be? When was the last time you were part of a conversation that you experienced as captivating, engaging and inspiring? How often do you feel connected with another through deep conversation? 

'Deep, Meaningful and Substantive'  

A substantive conversation is an engaging multi-faceted conversation in which meaningful dialogue occurs (e.g., “She fell in love with your dad? So, did they get divorced soon after? What was that like for you?”) rather than simplistic, surface niceties or matter-of-fact-logistical talk such as "What time will you arrive?" or "I will pick up milk after work."

This more intense style of communication is not attached to any type of pre-determined outcome. It possesses no other expectation other than to simply be experienced as enjoyable, enriching and satisfying. The effect of a passionate, engaging conversation can include greater understanding and appreciation of a topic and result in the development of a closer bond among those conversing.

Using technology to communicate -- such as talking on the phone, emailing, texting or the use of social media  -- does not qualify for the type of deep conversation that increases happiness and deepens meaning.  

When it comes to happiness-increasing conversationsms, the topic, discussed is insignificant.

The critical element is that the conversation goes deeper, entices and engages. It is likely to leave the conversationalists satisfied in much the same way that a  good film, book, song, performance or piece of art can be moving or uplifting. It touches that deep and very human place within us.

Just as self-disclosure instills a sense of intimacy in a relationship, deep conversations can instill a sense of shared meaning. The shared meaning strengthens social and personal bonds resulting in greater happiness and relationship satisfaction.  

Treat Yourself to a Happiness-Inducing Deep Conversation

Sometimes deep conversations just appear out of the blue without planning and they can be surprisingly delightful! But if you wish to be purposeful about adding deeper emotional and intellectual interpersonal engagement into your life, choose a chatty broad-minded person whose company you enjoy and whose opinions and values you respect and admire. It can be a spouse, friend, colleague, neighbor or family member.

Set aside at least an hour of uninterrupted, unhurried time in a relaxed environment.

You can either have a set agenda and bring up a topic which interests you -- or, you can just enjoy the twists and turns that emerge!

Your conversation may lead to something more or inspire some sort of action -- but it doesn't have to. Conversing with another and the joy it brings is meaningful enough. This is not about 'doing' but rather it's about 'experiencing'.

The Greek philosopher Socrates famously claimed that “the unexamined life is not worth living,” to which the 20th-century American philosopher Daniel Dennett replied: “The overly examined life is nothing to write home about either.”[4] Somewhere between Socrates and Dennett herein lies this truth: life is more meaningful when it is explored (deeply) with another.

ENDNOTES 

 

[1] Eavesdropping on Happiness: Well-Being Is Related to Having Less Small Talk and More Substantive Conversations. Sage Journal, Psychological Science, 2009  http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/02/17/0956797610362675.full

[2] Talk Deeply, Be Happy? by Roni Carin Rabin March 17, 2010 http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/talk-deeply-be-happy/

[3] Skip the Small Talk: Meaningful Conversations Linked to Happier People. Scientific America, October 2011.         http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=skip-the-small-talk

[4] The Perils of Small Talk by Wray Herbert, APA March 2010 http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/full-frontal-psychology/the-perils-of-small-talk.html

 
Jane Olinger February 26, 2013 at 01:18 pm
Hi Terri--
Well said! I would also add that for many people participating in deep conversation also means learning to tolerate and explore deep emotions, both one's own and those of the other. It also means being able to share the experience without judgment, without having all the "answers". Jane
Terri DiMatteo, LPC Open Door Therapy February 26, 2013 at 01:37 pm
Hi Jane,
Oh yes! I could not agree more. Thank you kindly for reading and responding to my blog post. In appreciation, Terri
Terri DiMatteo, LPC Open Door Therapy February 27, 2013 at 10:50 pm
Here's an interesting article somewhat related to this blog post:
"Four Effective Practices for Gaining Perspective" #2: Seek out an older grandparent, great uncle or someone you know who is 80+ years and initiate a purpose-filled conversation. http://www.thechangeblog.com/4-effective-practices-for-gaining-perspective/

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.