.
Feedback

Construction is Underway at The Root Building

Retail and apartment space is available for lease.

Construction has begun on what will become the two-story, 37-foot-high structure known as The Root Building located at 439 South Avenue West.

Formerly home to Clyne and Murphy and several other businesses that were destroyed by a six-alarm blaze in January, the site, dormant since the buildings were razed, is beginning to take shape. 

William Root, who has owned the land for the past 45 years, chose to rebuild and in June, the Westfield Planning Board approved plans for the new construction.

The Root Building, which will offer 5,000 square feet of retail space on the first floor and five luxury apartements on the second, is expected to be open by spring, said listing agent David Barbosa of David Realty Group.

"They (the apartments) will be one- and two- bedrooms, fully-updated with granite countertops, washer and dryers in each apartment, hardwood floors, stainless steel appliances and tiled backsplashes in the kitchen just to name a few (of the amenities)," Barbosa said. "It will also be an elevatored building."

The 5,000 square feet of retail space can be divided into sections as small as 1,000-square feet. The price per square foot is $25 annually, the "best in town," Barbosa added. The leases will be negotiable on the term. Pricing for the one- and two-bedroom apartments is not available just yet. 

When plans for The Root Building were approved, Patch readers expressed concerns regarding parking, which they believe is already at a premium in Westfield. But Barbosa feels there will be "plenty of parking."

"There are 20 municipal parking spots in front of building on Westfield Avenue and more on South Avenue. There is also street parking up the street by permit if the residents of the apartments need to park their cars. The building is gorgeous and will definitely be a landmark building in Westfield. We are very excited and can't wait to see this beautiful building complete," he said.   

For more information, contact David Barbosa of David Realty Group at (908) 264-8843

 

Anon October 6, 2012 at 10:04 pm
Ferraro's should have used their architect....looks nice...should spruce up South Ave
Proud South Sider October 9, 2012 at 04:29 pm
The building looks kind of bland. Should have used combination of materials, like brick/limestone, and cupola top. That would make a nice statement for south side curb appeal.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.