.
Feedback

Letter: Board of Health Discusses Dog Bites, Restaurant Conditions

Residents must license all cats and dogs through the Town Clerk and get them vaccinated against rabies, due to the presence of rabies in the county.

To the Editor: 

The Westfield Board of Health met on May 7, 2012. 

Seven dog bites occurred recently.  One resident was bruised in one incident and two dogs were euthanized as a result of the incidents, with one of them tested for rabies. Residents must license all cats and dogs through the Town Clerk and get them vaccinated against rabies, due to the presence of rabies in the county. An animal that is not properly licensed and vaccinated against rabies and that is involved in a biting incident is subject to a quarantine of at least 10 days, and the owner is issued a summons.

A Board Hearing was convened concerning a local restaurant that had a recent history of Sanitary Code violations. The restaurant corrected all past violations and its most recent inspection was satisfactory. After review, the Board unanimously voted to place the restaurant on a 12-month probation with conditions. Details will be posted in the Board minutes when approved. 

Twenty-three retail food establishments were inspected last month, of which 22 were satisfactory and 1 conditionally satisfactory. The Board is planning to post more detailed information about inspection results for restaurants and other retail food establishments in town, within the requirements of the State Sanitary Code. Until then, all residents are encouraged to be aware of the mandatory inspection certificate that must be clearly visible in a conspicuous place near the public entrance. Any resident who has questions or concerns regarding these or other environmental health issues can call the Principal Registered Environmental Health Specialist, Ken Pincus, MS, directly at 908-789-4070, extension 4072.

In addition, the Westfield Regional Health Department is sponsoring free health screenings with Overlook Medical Center in the Municipal Building. Diabetes Screening will be on Thursday, May 17, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and Stroke Risk Assessment will be on Tuesday, June 19, from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.  The stroke screening includes tests for blood pressure and blood lipids (fats) and sugar and individualized counseling. For more information about these programs and to register, please call the Overlook Community Health Department at 1-800-247-9580.

Information about all of the Health Department’s activities is available on its website http://www.westfieldnj.gov/health. The complete minutes of the May 7 meeting will be posted after review and approval at our June 4 meeting, which starts at 5:30 p.m. in the . 

Lawrence D. Budnick, MD

President, Westfield Board of Health 

838 Nancy Way

Westfield, NJ 07090

(day) 973-972-2900

(evening) 908-232-4364

LDB838@verizon.net

Codyblue May 17, 2012 at 09:31 pm
Why is the restaurant with questionable sanitary conditions not named. Are we to be the guinea pigs for food poisoning in Westfield restaurants? NYC has grades posted in the windows of all restaurants and I believe the public deserves these measures as well in the town of Westfield. It only makes sense to protect the public....more so than the pocketbook of the restaurant owners who should know better....that it should be a given... that their establishments pass any and all health inspections.
Elizabeth Alterman (Editor) May 17, 2012 at 10:47 pm
Hi Codyblue, I have asked for clarification on "more detailed information about inspection results for restaurants and other retail food establishments" that the Board intends to post in town and will post an update when I have more information. Thanks, Liz
Lawrence Budnick May 19, 2012 at 01:01 am
I appreciate your interest and comments.
1) The Westfield Board of Health is required to use the New Jersey State Sanitary Code. A restaurant's current rating (Satisfactory, Conditional Satisfactory and Unsatisfactory) must be posted in a conspicuous location near the public entrance. So, residents can and should look for the mandatory inspection rating near the front public entrance. 2) Ratings for all restaurants, including those that have had Board hearings, are named in the Board of Health minutes for the month in which the restaurant was most recently inspected. This is public information and is published on the Westfield Regional Health Department website when the minutes are voted and approved by the Board. When we can, given the dwindling resources available, we will post inspection ratings online in a searchable format. 3) Residents can also call the health department at 908-789-4070 extension 4072 to get the latest info. 4) Meetings and hearings of the Board are open to the public and are publicized in advance. Meetings generally occur on the first Monday each month, except January, July and September, at 5:30 pm in the Municipal Building, and the public is invited to attend. Lawrence D. Budnick, MD, President, Westfield Board of Health

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.