.
Feedback

Council Restores Central and Sycamore Crossing Guard

Decision made based on new traffic data.

The crossing guard will be returning to the intersection of Central and Sycamore starting Thursday.

Town Council members announced Tuesday night that after reviewing results of a recent traffic study at the intersection, they have decided to restore the crossing guard they cut last month. The cut was made as part of the overall reduction in the number of crossing guards, made in response to a revenue decline in the town budget.

The cut at Central and Sycamore caused a mobilization of residents in the Manor Park neighborhood, who said children walking from the neighborhood - on the eastern side of Central Avenue - to Jefferson School and Edison Intermediate School were in danger when crossing the intersection. They said the heavy traffic at the intersection and drivers rushing the light and making turns have encroached on the crosswalks. Parents have been coming to Town Council meetings for several weeks urging the Council to reinstate the crossing guard.

Council members said the crossing guard was cut from the intersection due to a traffic light being at the intersection.

The issue has become a partisan hot potato in recent weeks with Democrats - led by former Third Ward Council candidate Matt Sontz - opposing the cut against the Republican dominated Council. Sontz denied there was any partisan motivation in the issue and said he has not determined if he will again seek the third ward seat in 2011. Sontz lost two to one against Councilman Mark Ciarrocca in 2007.

The Council had a traffic enforcement officer study the intersection for several weeks and the data in the traffic report led to the Council's public safety committee to reinstate the guard.

Council members thanked all the parents for their input and they all felt very good that they are able to ensure the safety of the children.  They were sorry that this was ever a problem at all, but said that until you actually implement a particular solution and see it in action, you can't know all of its pitfalls.  One mother, Michelle Weinberg, was present and thanked the council for their action on this issue.

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.