.
Feedback

Houston's Burial Cost Westfield Taxpayers $9,000

Late pop singer Whitney Houston's funeral service and burial at Fairview Cemetery cost NJ taxpayers nearly $199,000 in police overtime, according to reports.

Whitney Houston's Feb. 19 burial at  cost Westfield taxpayers $9,000, The Star Ledger reported Friday morning

"That was to, primarily, maintain traffic flow and safety on and along the roads," Mayor Andy Skibitsky told the Ledger. "And I know Fairview Cemetery incurred significantly more than that in expenses to provide security at the cemetery."

Following Houston's burial, the private 105-acre cemetery employed off-duty police officers to ensure that only those with loved ones buried on the property were admitted. 

The Newark Police Department spent $187,621 in overtime costs for personnel staffing the funeral of Houston, whose star-studded memorial service in February drew a horde of media from around the globe to the city. 

The information on police overtime was obtained under a public records request. The Newark Police Department did not immediately respond to additional requests for information last week. 

Police officers were stationed at New Hope Baptist Church in Newark within hours of the singer’s passing Feb. 11 in Beverly Hills. Newark police were also on hand the following day, when normal Sunday services were dedicated to Houston's memory and reporters gathered at the church to interview congregants.

The Essex County Sheriff’s Office spent close to $2,000 in overtime, according to Sheriff Armando Fontoura, who told the Ledger that he used members of his "volunteer deputy division" to stave off manpower costs. The only officers who required overtime were the K-9 and Bomb Squad units who checked the church in the hours before the funeral began.

The 48-year-old singer, who was found dead in the bathroom of her Beverly Hills hotel room on Feb. 11, was buried next to her father, John Houston. 

JERSEY GIRL April 6, 2012 at 04:12 pm
$9000.00 to taxpayers and the hassle of now trying to visit your loved ones at the Cemetary.(back gate locked)
KWC April 6, 2012 at 05:54 pm
Yes, you often pay for things you don't benefit from, and you often receive the benefits of things you don't pay for. It's called civilization. It's not novel.
madamson April 6, 2012 at 07:29 pm
There is no need for any kind of police presence there. She is no more special than anyone else in that cemetary. Let her family pay for everything. From the funeral down to all of the costs for the police and OT costs. Her mother claims that WH was not broke when she died and her daughter supposedly stands to inherit a sizeable estate by the time she is 30 .... let them take care of everything. After all, everyone else does that when their loved one passes away.
Truth Hurts April 6, 2012 at 08:32 pm
what are you going to do about it?
middle schooler April 6, 2012 at 10:03 pm
Totally agree. She was no more special than anyone else, and the taxpayers from Westfield have to pay for the funeral of a women who killed herself. For those who disagree about her death being a suicide, she chose to take drugs. If I lived in Westfield, I would sue her family-they are the ones who should have to pay for her funeral: not the hard-working citizens of Westfield.
middle schooler April 6, 2012 at 10:04 pm
so what are the benefits of a drug addict's death?
NR9 April 6, 2012 at 10:21 pm
KWC makes a good point above. And, to put the dollar amount into perspective... $9,000 cost to Westfield divided by 10,000 households in Westfield = cost of about 90-cents per household. Consider this cost per household, along with KWC's point above, and this issue really should be considered a non-issue.
Pete April 7, 2012 at 11:36 am
90c here, $1 there and voila, here's your 5 figure tax bill.
middle schooler April 7, 2012 at 11:45 am
Maybe you have the money to pay for it, but others don't. Hey, let's make all burials payed for by tax dollars, even if they are bathing in money!!!! In order to be fair to everyone, that is what we would have to do!!! So count that money up. Lets use aprox. 100 burials. $9000x100burials/10000 hard-working taxpayers=$90 each. Yah sure. So fair and it doesnt cost anything.
Jeff B April 7, 2012 at 12:54 pm
The $9,000 spent by the town isn't as significant as that "Fairview Cemetery incurred significantly more than that in expenses to provide security at the cemetery." I am personally aware that police were still there on March 24. This has to have put a big hole in their budget. The already very substantial one-time fees to purchase a gravesite and then open and close (and maintain) it after a person passes away may go up a non-trivial amount, as those fees seem to be Fairview's principal source of revenue to pay expenses from.
Rusty Cut April 7, 2012 at 01:14 pm
Surprisingly not all that much. Good news.
JERSEY GIRL April 9, 2012 at 02:39 pm
What are they building at Fariview in the location of her grave?? Does anyone have any info? Looks like they are building a bldg of her grave......

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Rob Goldstein June 14, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Karen Egert, were you opposed to the DARE program that was in effect a few years ago? The DARERead More officer (whether it was a uniformed officer or detective) always carried his or her duty firearm in the school and was at each school on a weekly basis.
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
Charles Sullivan June 12, 2013 at 05:28 pm
Maddy, Thank you for your comment and I agree that's a lot of money. I just wanted to let you knowRead More that I wanted to give the board some options to consider in case they felt the need to hire a hybrid public safety officer with experience in security operations. Does the town need one, maybe. Can the WPD do more in regards to daily school security, yes I think so but they don't have to assign a cop they already have on the books for this activity. Thank you again for time.
New perspective June 13, 2013 at 02:45 pm
Mr. Sullivan - thank you for your lengthy explanation and detail. I think one of the statements youRead More made should speak volumes to all "Resource officers are proactive, and they can stop something before it starts, Police Officers are re-active and they respond to locations to enforce the law." Do we really want an armed officer in the school who MAY react to let's say someone who has a watergun but the police officer *thinks* it is a real gun at first quick glance? This happens everyday thoughout this country all by accident. Do we really need WHS to be another statistic? Here's another question....why just have an SRO at the High School? Aren't the middle school aged children MORE prone to peer pressure and stress that can cause them to want to harm others as a reaction? In my Non-Professional opinion, middle school aged kids are more of a danger than High School kids.
John Q. Public June 14, 2013 at 11:17 am
Mr. Sullivan, I believe I read that the SRO position had been eliminated for budgetary reasons inRead More the past but that doesn't really address the first issue I mentioned, nor does your comment about having external foot patrols. (As an aside, I believe the crossing guard in the morning at the corner where the auditorium is is a regular sworn police officer). In addition, I see the presence or lack of such external patrols and the lack of coverage if a single SRO has a sick day as logistical issues that can be worked out as opposed to legitimate objections. I don't really see these as evidence going against the SRO concept.
concerned citizen June 11, 2013 at 08:03 pm
Egert is just against guns, that's it. Everything has to fit into this, her small world, and sheRead More tries hard to make it fit, squeezes it, bends it and massages it. She gets help from the elitist billionaire Nanny Bloomberg for the talking points, but he has none regarding this specific topic, so she flounders.
john June 11, 2013 at 10:28 pm
Karen, karen, karen. it is to easy. never mind.
karen egert June 15, 2013 at 10:28 pm
GGG - I have nothing against the Westfield police . On the contrary, on the few occasions I hadRead More interactions with any of them., they were all professional , courteous and very helpful . I am grateful for our Westfield police . I believe that the wonderful job they do as trained police officers is spectacular . I just disagree with the use of a police officer that has only been trained in the duties of an SRO for 7 to 10 days to be the ones counseling our children. . But please don't say I'm against police officers . That's inaccurate and unfair .
karen egert June 11, 2013 at 01:38 am
Thank you Matt for working to represent the third ward . If elected I hope you will work to moveRead More the traffic light on Central Ave that is literally on a resident's driveway . It also flashes as soon as it turns red . As my street is one block from there , I often see residents walking across the crosswalk while the lights are flashing . It doesn't make sense and it's dangerous . Putting that light there is also a terrible thing to do to that resident in our Third Ward . It's wrong and we need it moved .