.
Feedback

Contractor Admits Rigging Bids and Inflating School Contracts in Westfield

Engineer for school districts and two other contractors previously pleaded guilty.

Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa announced that a contractor pleaded guilty today to rigging bids and inflating school contracts at the direction of an engineer who oversaw construction projects for the Westfield and Tinton Falls school districts.

John Sangiuliano, 57, of Scotch Plains, co-owner of Metropolitan Metal Window Company, pleaded guilty today to an accusation charging him with third-degree making false representations for a government contract before Superior Court Judge Joseph P. Donohue in Union County. The state will recommend that he be sentenced to a term of probation, conditioned upon him paying $36,000 in restitution to the Westfield and Tinton Falls districts and a $25,000 penalty to the state’s Anti-Trust Revolving Fund for anti-trust enforcement efforts.  Sangiuliano and his company will be disqualified from public contracts in New Jersey for five years.  Deputy Attorney General Vincent J. Militello took the guilty plea for the Division of Criminal Justice Corruption Bureau. Sangiuliano is scheduled for sentencing on Sept. 7.

In pleading guilty, Sangiuliano admitted that he falsified bids for contracts in the Westfield and Tinton Falls school districts at the behest of the engineer who oversaw construction projects in those districts, Kenneth Disko, and paid him approximately $36,000 in kickbacks.

Disko, 48, of Mountainside, the former contracted engineer or engineer/architect on record for the Westfield, Tinton Falls and Scotch Plains-Fanwood school districts, pleaded guilty on Oct. 12 to second-degree making false representations for a government contract.  He was sentenced on March 16 to three years in state prison. Disko admitted that he orchestrated a series of bid-rigging and kickback schemes from 2001 to 2010 in those three districts involving Sangiuliano and two other contractors, Martin W. Starr, 45, of Cliffwood Beach , owner of Starr Contracting, and Stephen M. Gallagher, 51, of Cliffwood Beach, owner of East Commercial Construction.

Starr and Gallagher pleaded guilty on Dec. 1, 2011 , to third-degree making false representations for a government contract.  Under their plea agreements, the state will recommend that each man be sentenced to up to 364 days in the county jail and a term of probation.  Their companies also pleaded guilty. The individual and corporate defendants will be disqualified from public contracts for five years, and will be jointly and severally liable for paying a $50,000 penalty to the Anti-Trust Revolving Fund. Starr and Gallagher are scheduled to be sentenced on July 20.

The investigation was led by Deputy Attorney General Militello, Sgt. Lisa Shea and Detective Michael Behar of the Division of Criminal Justice Corruption Bureau.

The investigation revealed that Sangiuliano, in bidding on contracts for the Westfield and Tinton Falls school districts, knowingly prepared fraudulent quotes at Disko’s direction bearing the names of other legitimate contractors, making the quotes higher than his own.  He also knowingly inflated Metropolitan’s quotes and the cost of repairs for the contracts at Disko’s direction.  In exchange for the inflated contracts, Sangiuliano allegedly gave kickbacks to Disko of at least $36,000 in 2009 and 2010.  The investigation revealed that Disko also received over $44,000 in kickbacks from a prior owner of Metropolitan who is now deceased for contracts awarded from 2001 to 2004.

In a related matter stemming from the investigation, the former business administrator for the Westfield School District, Robert A. Berman, 55, of South Plainfield, pleaded guilty to third-degree conspiracy to make false representations for a government contract.  He admitted that he accepted $13,000 in windows and doors from Sangiuliano, who he recommended be hired by the school district.  Berman was sentenced on Jan. 27 to one year of probation and was ordered to pay a $6,000 penalty. He forfeited his position with the school district and is permanently barred from public employment in New Jersey.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

w June 29, 2012 at 02:06 am
why don't we let him resign, pay him 4 his unused sick days, and give him a pension, instead.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.