.
Feedback

Kids Can’t Make Mistakes Anymore….

generationtextonline Protecting our Kids from the Dangers of Cyberbullying

Kids can’t make mistakes anymore….Do you remember being a senior in high school? What if you or I were growing up in 2012 and one of the mistakes we made resulted in being expelled from high school in our senior year and losing our scholarship to go to college? Use this story as a reference when talking to teens about a digital footprint. Our kids deserve to know that an online “joke” or a “senior prank” could cost them their dreams….

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/04/chris-latour-massachusett_n_2239867.html

Jill Brown

Generation Text Online

jill.brown@GenerationTextOnline.com

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

The Duke December 15, 2012 at 04:54 pm
Seems we are more forgiving to drug offenders than to minors who use bad judgment on social media. Community service might have been a better option.
Help time December 18, 2012 at 01:09 pm
When Westfield teacher Brendan Hickey made a mistake, he broke the law. The s hook district responded by allowing him to retain his teaching certificate by not filing tenure charges against him. What kind of message are we sending our students? It's OK to break the law and possess marijuana, and keep your job teaching the same children you are supposed to be somewhat of a role model to. Ultimately, parents should be the first line of defense against the poor judgement and decisions a child makes. Mistakes will happen and they can be forgiven with leniency. However, when a law is broken and that "mistake" frays the fabric of morals, the culprit is exposed to another level of consequences. Do the crime, do the time.
JERSEY GIRL December 18, 2012 at 05:02 pm
I couldnt agree with you more.
Dont know how he looks his coworkers/students in the face everyday to be honest.I would have lost all respect for him.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.