.
Feedback

How Can You Use the Newtown, Connecticut Tragedy as a Lesson for Your Students?

If you are interested in talking about this tragedy in order to develop some sort of solution for the kids in your life...

Last Saturday morning one of my friends called to ask if I had heard about the tragedy is Newtown, Connecticut. I told her I had heard of it but had decided not to watch the news or read the newspapers because I didn’t think I could handle the horrific details of that Friday morning at Sandy Hook Elementary School. My friend replied by saying, “Isn’t that the field you work in?” My response…“I don’t work in teen violence. I work with teens regarding bullying, cyberbullying, positive school climate and character education. My friend said, “But isn’t this the same thing? I mean, don’t you think this kid who was the killer was probably a victim of some sort?”

Since that morning, I have been thinking about what she said. I do have experience with what kids go through when they feel like a victim. It is my experience that both kids and adults use many different forms of destructive behavior to deal with their pain such as: suicide, cutting, alcohol abuse, drug abuse and even violence. I do know plenty of people who were harassed, intimidated and bullied but it didn’t result in them committing mass murder of innocent people. But then again, I don’t have any experience with mental illness. 

Monday afternoon I was picking up Spencer, my third grader from school. I bumped into one of the other moms and I asked if she knew if the principal or any of the teachers had spoken about the tragedy in Newton, Ct. to the students. She said she didn’t know, and then she said, “Did you see a picture of the killer? He looks like the typical nerd, the geek, the type kids make fun of.” 

I started to think about the shooter. 

Was 20 year old, Adam Lanza a victim of some sort? What drove Adam to do this?  Had he experienced teasing, harassment or humiliation? What about embarrassment or intimidation? Had he been a victim of bullying or cyberbullying? I would guess that he had some type of mental illness but what played into the anger, sadness and need for retaliation?

If you are interested in talking about this tragedy in order to develop some sort of solution for the kids in your life, I suggest you talk about it by using the 7 steps that are outlined in the Generation Text Online program.  In my opinion, your main focus should be on steps 1, 2 and 4.

The Generation Text Online 7 Steps to understanding how to stop bullying/cyberbulllying, create a positive school climate and practice 21st century character education.

1.      What exact behaviors are considered bullying/cyberbullying?

2.      How does bullying really affect someone?

3.      Bystanders – Why don’t kids stand up?

4.      Bystanders – Explain WHY we have to stand up

5.      Bystanders – Exact actions of HOW you can stand up

There are 4 ways to stand up for a victim.

  • ·         As a single bystander
  • ·         As a Group of Bystanders
  • ·         Ask an adult for advice
  • ·         Report it anonymously

6.      Consequences

  • ·         Legal
  • ·         Personal
  • ·         School

7.      Accountability

Here are some discussion questions you may want to use with your students:

Step 1: What types of things happened to this boy? What was done to him? How often? Were there specific people that bullied him or was it an idea or an institution that he felt bullied by? Step 2: How did those things affect him? How did those things make him feel? Step 4: (Typically we look at this step from the bully or bystander point of view. We look at things that victims have done to deal with their pain. The idea is to help the bully and the bystander understand that a victim might take extreme measures to deal with their pain, such as suicide or cutting) What did Adam do with those feelings? How did it cause him to act out?

Would you guess that Adam Lanza was happy, confident and at peace? Or do you think this kid was sad, self-conscious, hurt or in emotional pain? 

One of the most important set of principles that I use to guide my teachings is this:

•             We have no control of what anybody does, says or how they act. 

•             We can’t change anyone.

•             We can control our own behaviors, words and actions. 

If this kid had been your classmate, teammate or neighbor, what could you have done to be positive, supportive or just nice? What action would you have been comfortable taking? What types of words would you have used when speaking with him?  What type of interactions with him could you have focused on if you had known him?

Jill Brown

Generation Text Online

jill.brown@GenerationTextOnline.com

karen egert March 22, 2013 at 12:19 am
The sad reality is that it was not anything he experienced from his peers . In fact , the school was trying to help him integrate and he was connecting more and doing better .
Until his mother suddenly took him out of Newtown HS and enrolled him in a college to take college courses . That is when he became more detached , spent more time alone and began his solitary road to connecting with violent video game characters . The real mentally ill person was seemingly his mother -- all the while encouraging him to use guns and even illegally buying him guns for his birthday . The picture is now emerging . Again , I would argue if that Ar -15 with 30 rounds of ammunition was banned , he could not have carried out his " plan " . It would have remained just a twisted fantasy in his head . Guns do kill

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.
Charles Sullivan June 12, 2013 at 05:28 pm
Maddy, Thank you for your comment and I agree that's a lot of money. I just wanted to let you knowRead More that I wanted to give the board some options to consider in case they felt the need to hire a hybrid public safety officer with experience in security operations. Does the town need one, maybe. Can the WPD do more in regards to daily school security, yes I think so but they don't have to assign a cop they already have on the books for this activity. Thank you again for time.
New perspective June 13, 2013 at 02:45 pm
Mr. Sullivan - thank you for your lengthy explanation and detail. I think one of the statements youRead More made should speak volumes to all "Resource officers are proactive, and they can stop something before it starts, Police Officers are re-active and they respond to locations to enforce the law." Do we really want an armed officer in the school who MAY react to let's say someone who has a watergun but the police officer *thinks* it is a real gun at first quick glance? This happens everyday thoughout this country all by accident. Do we really need WHS to be another statistic? Here's another question....why just have an SRO at the High School? Aren't the middle school aged children MORE prone to peer pressure and stress that can cause them to want to harm others as a reaction? In my Non-Professional opinion, middle school aged kids are more of a danger than High School kids.
John Q. Public June 14, 2013 at 11:17 am
Mr. Sullivan, I believe I read that the SRO position had been eliminated for budgetary reasons inRead More the past but that doesn't really address the first issue I mentioned, nor does your comment about having external foot patrols. (As an aside, I believe the crossing guard in the morning at the corner where the auditorium is is a regular sworn police officer). In addition, I see the presence or lack of such external patrols and the lack of coverage if a single SRO has a sick day as logistical issues that can be worked out as opposed to legitimate objections. I don't really see these as evidence going against the SRO concept.
concerned citizen June 11, 2013 at 08:03 pm
Egert is just against guns, that's it. Everything has to fit into this, her small world, and sheRead More tries hard to make it fit, squeezes it, bends it and massages it. She gets help from the elitist billionaire Nanny Bloomberg for the talking points, but he has none regarding this specific topic, so she flounders.
john June 11, 2013 at 10:28 pm
Karen, karen, karen. it is to easy. never mind.
karen egert June 15, 2013 at 10:28 pm
GGG - I have nothing against the Westfield police . On the contrary, on the few occasions I hadRead More interactions with any of them., they were all professional , courteous and very helpful . I am grateful for our Westfield police . I believe that the wonderful job they do as trained police officers is spectacular . I just disagree with the use of a police officer that has only been trained in the duties of an SRO for 7 to 10 days to be the ones counseling our children. . But please don't say I'm against police officers . That's inaccurate and unfair .