.

State of the State After Sandy

During the State of the State address tomorrow, Governor Christie must outline plans to rebuild the Shore smarter and more resilient

Tomorrow Governor Christie will deliver the State of the State speech.  The Governor’s message will be especially important in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.  Thousands of people across the state are still dealing with the impacts of this tragedy.  In his address the Governor should outline his policies for rebuilding our coast and creating a stable funding source for open space programs.  This must include keeping environmental standards in place, adaptation and hazard planning, regional planning, green building codes, taking steps to prevent future flooding.  We need the Governor to present a plan that will protect families from the impacts of climate disruption and sea level rise.  In New Jersey we deserve strong action by Governor Christie to help reduce the likelihood and severity of future disasters.

This is one of the most important State of the State addresses any Governor can give after the destruction and damage from Hurricane Sandy.  We all need to come together and work to not only rebuild our state but move our state forward.  This State of the State address should unify us and call for moving the state forward in better direction.  We need to rebuild our coast but we need to do it better and smarter.  We cannot repeat the mistakes of the past, otherwise we will be wasting money, hurting the environment and putting people in harm’s way. 

In the State of the State the Governor must address how New Jersey will prepare for climate disruption.  A recent study found that by 2050 the sea level at Sandy Hook could rise by 21 to 35 inches, meaning water could move up to three feet inland.  A study by Rutgers University four years ago found that given the storm surges as a result of climate change, 9% of New Jersey’s land area could be under water.  The areas hit hardest by Hurricane Sandy are some of the very areas identified in the Rutgers report.  We need to implement hazard and adaptation planning to move people and property out of harm’s way as we rebuild.  Critical infrastructure for the state such as Newark Airport, nuclear power plants, electrical generation plants, sewer plants, chemical plants, and transportation hubs are all prone to flooding and storm surges and need to be better protected. 

We need to look at regional planning and establishing a Coastal Commission or Council that will coordinate efforts to rebuild along the shore and to ensure we protect vital infrastructure, do proper planning and zoning, and develop strong building codes.  During the recovery, this body would help coordinate funding and regional rebuilding activities so that redevelopment in one town does not negatively impact neighboring communities.  A Coastal Commission would better coordinating redevelopment, saving taxpayer money by not being redundant when it comes to infrastructure.  We can fix environmental problems by taking a regional approach to stormwater, transportation, beach access, and other types of planning.  Oversight will help limit waste, fraud, and abuse

By having a Coastal Commission we will end up saving taxpayers money, we can build better and smarter, and help prevent the pay-to-play culture from wasting tax payer money during rebuilding efforts.  Regional planning will ensure we can have a shore for future generations.  Without it we are condemned to the mistakes of the past.

The Governor must address better planning and updating building codes. We need to implement green building codes and standards that require structures to stand up better to higher winds and flooding.  We need to build further back from flood prone areas and the dunes and also make sure we elevate not only houses but key infrastructure.  We need to enhance dunes and natural systems.  When we rebuild homes and businesses we need to make them more energy efficient.  We also need to invest in renewable energy and distributive generation.  We should not just be adapting to climate change but working to prevent it as well.   

As we move forward with rebuilding the Governor must commit to not waiving environmental standards.  We should not be weakening regulations, but rather strengthening them to better protect people and property.  DEP Commissioner Bob Martin has signed an Administrative Consent Order waiving compliance with CAFRA, Flood Hazard Area, and wetlands protections for infrastructure rebuilding after Hurricane Sandy.  Under the ACO infrastructure is being rebuilt again in vulnerable places.  The DEP waiver rule would also allow reconstruction activities to evade environmental standards.  The ACO and waiving environmental standards discourages planning that would prevent the damage from occurring again by elevating or moving infrastructure to a safer place.  

One of the lessons of Hurricane Sandy is weakening environmental standards and waiving protections will end up causing more damage, hurting the economy and environment.  Places where we actually had stronger protections in place fared much better during the storm.

The Governor also needs to outline what will be done to prevent future flooding.  Rolling back Highlands protections will only make downstream flooding worse.  We need to implement the latest FEMA flood maps now and the upcoming versions that will include data from Hurricane Sandy flooding to better protect families and businesses.  New Jersey needs to commit to stopping the promotion of development in flood prone and wetland areas, which makes the consequences of weather events more extreme and places more people in harm’s way.

During the State of the State the Governor must announce his plans for a stable source of funding for our open space programs, which have no future funding in place.  The Green Acres and Blue Acres programs need a stable source of funding so that land acquisitions can move forward and move families out of harm’s way.  This funding will allow us to purchase many of the sites that see continual flooding and storm surges.  We need funding to preserve lands to create more dunes and areas for flood water storage.  The best way to establish a stable source of open space funding would be a water user fee. 

Some of his policies in the past made impacts from the storm worse such as weakening protections, pulling out of RGGI, and implementing the DEP Waiver Rule.  Now the Governor has an important opportunity to correct past actions and make the state more vibrant and resilient. 

The Governor has been a strong leader dealing with the hurricane and its aftermath.  Leadership also means the ability to bring people together to move the state forward.  Sometimes we have to make tough choices because they are right, not because they are politically expedient.  The Governor has a great opportunity to ensure that as we rebuild the coast we do it better and smarter and that we have a coast for future generations.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

fed up January 15, 2013 at 01:16 AM
Utter nonsense.
BillBalls January 15, 2013 at 01:18 AM
Kangaroo farts could ease global warming: http://wizbangblog.com/content/2007/12/06/kangaroo-farts-could-ease-global-warming.php
BillBalls January 15, 2013 at 01:20 AM
Then there are some who say climate change was at the heart of the dinosaur destruction. I didn’t know they drove cars!
David Harrison January 15, 2013 at 01:45 AM
Global warming deniers: do yourselves a favor and do some research about what is arguably the greatest challenge mankind has ever faced. The bottom line is this: this is an extremely complicated scientific problem so to dismiss (or confirm) it based on any one factor such as the notion that the planet has always gone through climate cycles is ludicrous. There are tens of thousands of very smart, qualified people who have dedicated their lives to the study of climate change. Citing all public surveys of those professionals, the range of those who believe that human activity, specifically the emission of greenhouse gasses, is PARTLY responsible for global warming is 82 - 98%, with the lower end of the range including scientists who are compensated by or otherwise tied to the fossil fuel industry. Ninety eight percent of those who matter most. Side with them or roll the dice? Your choice and good luck explaining your position to your grandchildren if you choose the contrarian view. Want to learn more? Please join me for discussion at the Millburn library on Weds. Jan. 30 at 7:00 pm. Alternatively, you can stick your head back in the sand, keep spouting your propaganda and pretend that nothing is awry...PS to Donna G. - climate science 101: Weather and climate are two different things, loosely related.
fed up January 15, 2013 at 02:01 AM
Liberalism is the greatest challenge mankind has ever faced.
BN January 15, 2013 at 02:34 AM
AGW is horse crap. http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=10917
BN January 15, 2013 at 02:36 AM
Don't believe the BS coming from the church of Al Gore. Watch and learn. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xcm9qsVaf0o
joe marsh January 15, 2013 at 04:05 AM
First it was global warming now it's climate change...what will it be called next so people like Al Gore can line their pockets??? Doesn't the sale of HIS network to a company that is owned by an oil rich nation prove that he was just in it for the cash?
Donna Griffin January 15, 2013 at 12:27 PM
stewart - Would you propose then that we collectively hold our breaths in order to reduce carbon emissions? How do suggest we "control" China's "carbon footprint?" Perhaps President Obama (since you seem to want to politicize this) could send them a tersely worded letter.
Donna Griffin January 15, 2013 at 12:31 PM
David - I'm not arguing that climate on our planet cycles. I am arguing that to attribute a political agenda to same is noteworthy and foolhardy. Again....refer to the University of East Anglia scandal. And when you state that scientists "believe" in global warming, I am even further unconvinced. I would much rather they "prove" it.
stewart resmer January 15, 2013 at 12:56 PM
Donna, climate change denial is on the 3rd floor along with tin foil hats and flat earth society items including great deals on new old stock unused 2011 snow plows. Prepper shelters have been moved to the basement, assault weapons have been discontinued entirely.
stewart resmer January 15, 2013 at 01:20 PM
uhmmm donna? China pledges to curb auto emissions, reduce air pollution.LATimes.com Holding your breath would be a good start here abouts, and no, I do not seek to politicize 'this' you on the other hand seem to be eager to shift the political discussion away from the failed policies of the sitting governor
sammy January 15, 2013 at 01:48 PM
WEll said fed up. that is it in a nutshell. nanny state, lib disaster chasing money grubbing, do nothing , so called intellectuals with no regard for truth. just their idea of how the facts are interpreted.
Anthony T. January 15, 2013 at 02:13 PM
The material of the boardwalk irrelevant in THIS situation. A storm will likely destroy a composite boardwalk as it will a wooden boardwalk, water is a tremendous force.
I am Spartacus January 15, 2013 at 02:21 PM
China also pledges to respect human rights. You dumb enough to believe them Stewart?
stewart resmer January 15, 2013 at 02:51 PM
sparty? The United States, with a history of both promoting and disregarding human rights abroad, has a similarly mixed record at home. The federal government continues abusive counterterrorism policies, including indefinite detention and flawed military commissions at Guantanamo Bay. The criminal justice system is marred by racial disparities and harsh sentences. The US incarcerates more people than any other country, often in conditions that violate inmates’ rights. The rights of immigrants—authorized and unauthorized—are threatened by federal policies, state laws, and the rapid expansion of immigration detention. Finally, the US sometimes fails to provide remedies to survivors of abuse, particularly women and vulnerable groups. Source: Human Rights Watch
Monk January 15, 2013 at 03:54 PM
I still like to call it "weather". Every article has slightly different numbers, but ... Earth's atmosphere: N2 >78%, O2 =21%, Argon <1%, the rest =0.037680%. Of that, Carbon Dioxide = 0.035%. Of that, anthropogenic CO2 = some infinitesimally small number. This is tilting at windmills, attacking imaginary enemies. The cost of this "war" on fossil fuels is less justified than the cost of the wars in the Middle East.
stewart resmer January 15, 2013 at 09:07 PM
Pascrell: Christie hasn't done enough to fight for Sandy aid
I am Spartacus January 15, 2013 at 09:31 PM
Name me 1 person in this region who has done more to get Sandy Aid on the agenda, on the national news and through Congress and chances are I will call you a liar b/c nobody has done more than Christie.
The Stig January 15, 2013 at 09:33 PM
Christie has done more than the legislative delegations of NY, NJ & CT, combined. He's done more than Obama, and he's done more than the governors of NY & CT. There are things you can ding Christie on, this isn't one of them.
Dazed not Confused January 15, 2013 at 10:12 PM
Exactly what is your definition of 'liberalism?' How about 'liberal media' What might that include in your book?
Dazed not Confused January 15, 2013 at 10:14 PM
Agree w/ Spartacus and Stig; you may not agree w/ Christie's agenda or style, but he is fighting hard for our state, particularly in the wake of this disaster.
David Harrison January 16, 2013 at 01:34 AM
Donna G., I would rather they 'prove' it too but that notion once again signifies that you are not well versed on the science. To repeat, it's very complicated with many contributing factors, some of which we can control and others we cannot. Research and discovery is ongoing of course, but in the meantime the vast majority of the 98% of scientists who agree that humans are part of the cause (how much of the cause is really irrelevant because it's the only part we can control) also agree that our window for action to minimize or at least delay the worst effects is quickly closing. Hope to see you at the library on 1/30.
David Harrison January 16, 2013 at 01:40 AM
Al Gore is a mouthpiece, not a scientist. What he believes, says, does, how he lives, what he drives etc. has nothing to do with the science. If you want to maintain a contrarian view and have intelligent people take you seriously, do your homework and pay close attention to the source of the info. and who backs them financially. Fortunately, the internet makes that a relatively easy task. Monk, your numbers are interesting but are meaningless without context, and CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas. Some scientists maintain that methane is just as harmful.
BN January 16, 2013 at 02:57 AM
If research is "ongoing", why declare that "the science is settled"? Why ignore the other changes going on in our universe? The Earth is slowing and cooling. The magnetic north pole is rocketing towards Russia as our magnetic shields are collapsing. The atmosphere is shrinking as our Military dumps aluminum particles into it. Then there's glacial rebound, CME's, and the inconvenient truth that the polar ice caps on Mars are melting too. Clinging to the notion that man is responsible for our planet's changes demonstrates that these "scientists" are addicted to research grant money, and are useful idiots to those pushing for global governance.
BN January 16, 2013 at 03:03 AM
How about the people backing YOUR theories? The same people who stand to profit off the sale of carbon credits. While were on the subject, George Soros has a large stake in Monsanto. You DO know about Monsanto, right? If Yellowstone erupts or if a comet or CME "kill shot" hits, are you still going to blame mankind?
Donna Griffin January 16, 2013 at 04:47 AM
Sorry, David but I do not buy into "consensus" science. If a "theory" does not make sense to me, I do not ascribe to it simply to fulfill a political agenda. I think that we must do our part as residents of this earth to be good stewards. However, to say that we are largely responsible for global warming is nonsensical....and that, my friend, is where we will never find common ground. I think that there are far greater threats to humanity than an alleged carbon footprint.
Donna Griffin January 16, 2013 at 05:02 AM
Stewie - China pledges to reduce carbon emissions while our embassy in Beijing continues to provide their own air supply due to excessive smog. Have you seen the news this week? Please....political pollution policies which demand that the evil United States unilaterally shuts down industry is a chicken little philosophy which I'm not buying. I won't be riding a bike to work anytime soon or encouraging our nation to shut down oil production in order to soothe the shattered (allbeit, extremely wealthy) ego of the likes of Al Gore. You're welcome to drink the Kool Aid. Even climatologists have fessed up to continuing the myth of man-made global warming for the purposes of promoting financially lucrative policies.
b flake January 16, 2013 at 01:54 PM
Do what they do down on the outter banks of NC, for homes near the ocean and prone to flooding, build the homes up on pylons. Problem solved, you just have to pay for it.
David Harrison January 17, 2013 at 01:21 AM
BN, let's be clear, I have never and will never say 'man is responsible for our planet's changes.' What I said, is that I agree with scientific consensus that human activity is contributing to the warming climate. It is not the only factor, that is certain, but it is the only factor we can control. also certain. Secondly, yes I am well aware of Soros, Monsanto etc. There are bad eggs on both sides, no doubt, but once again that does not change the science. Your comment 'If research is "ongoing", why declare that "the science is settled" is ridiculous. Research continues re. smoking posing cancer risk, but does that mean it's not true? I do happen to know a doctor who says smoking does not increase risk of cancer, would you believe him? Finally, "Clinging to the notion that man is responsible for our planet's changes demonstrates that these "scientists" are addicted to research grant money" Really? If you were an unscrupulous scientist chasing $$, would you align yourself with an indebted government, university or other non-profit, or would you go for the most profitable industry in history?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »