.
Feedback

Financial Aid 101: CSS Profile vs. FAFSA

While all schools require the FAFSA for government-based college financial assistance, the College Board administers a similar program that some schools require known as the CSS PROFILE.

While all schools require the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) for government-based college financial assistance, the College Scholarship Service, a division of the College Board, administers a similar program that some schools (mostly private) require.

These forms allow schools to determine a student’s Estimated Family Contribution (EFC). This is the number used by the financial aid officer to help determine the types and amounts of aid to be awarded the student. In general, the EFC for an average family in our area will be 10% to 20% higher with the CSS Profile than with the FAFSA form.

Over 600 schools participate in the CSS Profile program. It helps schools determine the internal or other non-governmental aid (grants, scholarships and loans) offered to accepted students and was formerly known as the FAF.  It is designed to give colleges a more accurate look at a families' financial situation.

Methodologies

There are several differences in the two forms, one being the use of unique questions on the CSS PROFILE by each school. This leads to differences in the methodologies used to determine a student's financial need and estimated ability to contribute. Unlike the FAFSA, colleges that require the PROFILE have the option to add their own questions to the form. This, coupled with greater details in questioning (such as homeownership/equity and information of all parents and parental spouses) allows for greater professional judgment to be used by the financial aid officials when determining actual financial need, especially when due to certain or unusual circumstances.

Submission Dates

Another major difference between the two forms is submission. The FAFSA cannot be submitted until after January 1st, while the PROFILE can be completed in the fall. This helps schools determine financial aid eligibility for early applicants. When the FAFSA is filed later, adjustments may have to be made to the projected awards.

Other Differences

The PROFILE determines a minimum student contribution, while the FAFSA does not. The PROFILE also charges a fee for the general form and for each school. The FAFSA, as the name states, is free. There are many more questions on the PROFILE with over 300 questions, while the FAFSA has just over 100. This increases the chance for mistakes on that form, but both have their own list of common mistakes.  Complete the forms in phases and find help, where necessary. A mistake on these forms can literally cost you tens of thousands of dollars.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.