.
Feedback

Dressed for Success: Jude Connally Celebrates New Westfield Store

Boutique offers women's apparel and accessories.

Jude Connally is dressing up Westfield’s Central Avenue. From the cheerful orange awning that first greets visitors to the bold, bright prints of the dresses inside, the clothing boutique is one of the newest businesses to set up shop downtown.

While the store threw open its cobalt-blue doors on Nov. 20, shoppers were treated to a grand opening celebration on Thursday, Dec. 6 that included refreshments, a look at the latest fashions, and a chance to meet the team, including the designer herself, Jude Connally Zimmerman.

Sales manager Megan Phillips said opening the shop has been a “fun and exciting time.”

“It really exploded this morning,” said Phillips on the day of the grand opening. “It’s very exciting for Jude.”

Adding to the festive atmosphere were dozens of pastel and primary-colored helium balloons, with a prize tucked inside for each guest.

“The whole concept—pop a balloon, win a prize—shows Jude’s personality,” Phillips said. “Everyone’s a winner.”

In addition to the ready-to-wear dresses that don’t require dry cleaning, the shop also features earrings, bracelets, wraps and colorful coin purses.

Connally Zimmerman, a Cranford resident, maintains her business headquarters in Kenilworth, with the entire clothing line manufactured in Manhattan’s garment district.

“That’s something we feel really proud about, keeping the manufacturing in the United States,” said Jude Connally General Manager Michelle Ruggiero.

Ruggiero added that the Westfield community has warmly embraced the brand. Though the clothing line can be found in boutiques around the country, Ruggiero said there is something special about "having our flagship store in our backyard and interacting with women wearing our clothing first hand."

“We’re really excited about the warm welcome we’ve received from the Westfield community,” she said.

The Jude Connally team looks forward to providing personal service that is helpful yet not overbearing as shoppers take in the dress collection, which features styles named for special women in the designer’s life.

“There are dresses for every silhouette,” Ruggiero said. “Jude looks at real women and figures out what will look good on them and goes from there. Jude wants to help women look good and feel great. It’s perfect year-round. You just put it on and go; that’s the beauty of it. It moves with you and it feels good.”

While much of the clothing in the boutique is for the current season, resort wear is also available and makes a great gift for women planning mid-winter vacations, Ruggiero noted.

Shoppers can sign a guest book to receive notifications of upcoming Jude Connally events. 

For more information, visit Jude Connally's website, Facebook page or call 908-889-0900. 

Mary Robinson December 10, 2012 at 03:03 am
I LOVE these dresses! Makes getting ready for work, a party, or anything else, so easy! I get lots of compliments when I wear any of my (three, yes, three) Jude Connally dresses. They wash perfectly and always look great.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.