.
Feedback

"It's A Wonderful Life...If You're Harry Bailey" Thoughts On The Classic Movie's 2nd Villain

In my tongue-in-cheek take on the Frank Capra classic "It's A Wonderful Life" I expose George Bailey's kid brother Harry for the selfish ingrate he is.

Ah Christmas is only a week away and along with celebrating the birth of my Lord by trampling each other to save 20% on an Xbox at Wal-Mart (while supplies last), it also means that it’s time to get all misty eyed as we are treated to serial re-runs of Frank Capra’s iconic 1946 holiday film It’s A Wonderful Life

I've watched this movie more times than I can count on both hands and feet and like many Americans I still come away with that warm fuzzy feeling. I adore this bit of Americana and will take on comers in arguing that Jimmy Stewart (in his first role after returning from the war) as the multi-faceted George Bailey, does some of the finest acting in any film in any genre. But one character in this film always bothered me. In fact, I believe that the more appropriate title of Capra’s project should have been It’s A Wonderful Life – If You’re Harry Bailey! 

Think about it. George Bailey’s kid brother makes out like a bandit in this flick. And why is that? Because throughout this film, Harry (Todd Karns) is a steam-roller of self-centeredness. I will even go so far as to say that Harry Bailey (who was never intended to be a bad guy) is one of the most despicable characters in movies. In scriptwriting it’s formulaic that two villains be created to inject multiple layers of conflict. Obviously the wealthy but bitter and twisted Mr. Potter (Lionel Barrymore) is the uber-villain. But who’s the other antagonist? That would be Harry Bailey, who plays his older brother for a sucker throughout the film. In fact, Harry is either directly or indirectly the root cause of all George’s miseries. 

From a young age Harry seems to conspire to keep George pinned down in Bedford Falls , freeing him to fulfill his own dreams while leaving his older brother’s aspirations in a broken heap. As a child he falls through the ice compelling George to jump into the freezing water to save him and lose hearing in one ear for his heroics. 

Later, after their father dies suddenly, a deal is struck whereby George surrenders his college money to Harry. The idea is that when Harry graduates he’ll come back and take over the family business, freeing George to once and for all leave Bedford Falls behind. For four years George stays shackled to their father’s Bailey Building & Loan, a small and wholly unfulfilling nickel-and-dime enterprise he despises, all the while counting down the days of Harry’s return as he plans his future travels abroad. 

But when the big day comes what does slippery Harry do? After letting his brother sacrifice his best years to honor the deal, Harry comes home and announces out of the blue: “Meet the wife!” Whuuuh? No wedding? No family--including a widowed mother--at the ceremony? Not even a meet-and-greet beforehand?  Nothing save an ambiguous telegram beforehand announcing he is returning home with "big news?" 

We very quickly see that there’s a reason for Harry’s secrecy of course. George learns through Harry’s new bride, Ruth, that he’s already lined up a sweet job at her father’s company. In a brazen demonstration of insincerity, Harry pulls George aside and says all faux guilt-ridden: “You’ve been holding the bag here for four years… and, well, I won’t let you down, George.  But I would like to talk–” Whammo! The older Bailey’s face reveals a man whose hopes and dreams have just been ripped out and splattered onto the floor. Great brother, huh?  He springs a heretofore unknown wife on an unsuspecting George and then uses her as leverage to renege on their deal after four years of expectations that his purgatory was at an end.  George takes another bullet for Harry and reluctantly stays on at the Bailey B & L. Young Harry, with his new wife, a great job and degree in hand (the diploma originally intended for George remember) is free to move onward and upward to live his own wonderful life. 

One would think the advent of World War II finally gives George a chance to see the world. Even if in uniform and with all risks going to war entails at least adventure calls, right? Bzzzz! Sorry. He’s got a bum ear thanks to Harry remember? Thus is he 4-F and ineligible for military service. America’s mobilizing millions of her citizens and shipping them off to all parts of the globe George so desperately wants to explore, but because his good ol’ kid brother was dumb enough to slip through the ice, he’s outta luck, left behind to fight the battle of Bedford Falls. To add insult to injury, all the men from Bedford Falls like Bert the cop (wounded in North Africa, Silver Star) Ernie the cab driver (parachutes into France ) and the other band of misfits and screwballs that inhabit George’s small world return home as heroes.  

Not to be outdone, Harry Bailey, his ears very much intact, goes off to do battle in the most exciting of fashions as a Navy fighter pilot. Naturally at war’s end he’s awarded the Medal Of Honor for his heroics (did we expect less?) and on Christmas Eve finds himself in the White House meeting with the president; at the same time a frantic brother George is desperately avoiding some probing bank examiners as he stumbles about the snow-covered streets of Bedford Falls in a forlorn search for the eight grand in cash (that’s 100k in today’s money) that his dimwitted Uncle Billy – who was supposed to be working for Harry at this point remember – allowed to be stolen right out from under him by the conniving Potter. It happened because Billy (Thomas Mitchell) is so distracted from bragging to Potter about the exploits of, you guessed it, Harry Bailey, that he moronically leaves the money quite literally in the old man’s lap and struts off. Harry strikes again. 

In the end, after his guardian angel Clarence Odbody (Henry Travers) does his job and everything works out okay—meaning George doesn’t either kill himself or get arrested for fraud—a uniformed Harry Bailey, having been flown up from Washington D.C., muscles his way to the front and center of the crowd of townsfolk gathered at the Bailey home to help pay off George’s debt, and offers a toast: “To my big brother George, the richest man in town.” For now anyway. One wonders how long that will last before Harry pulls another self-centered stunt that will certainly benefit him at that same big brother’s expense. (Come to think of it, I didn’t see Harry reach into his pocket when the hat was passed around did you?)  

Don’t let that smile fool you, Georgie boy. Harry probably just wants something from you.

Ricky L. December 19, 2012 at 04:22 pm
Terrific commentary! I can imagine the long lost sequel had Harry's business busted for fraudulent accounting transactions, international bribery, and insider trading scams, so that, in the end, George can deliver his comeuppance.
elmwoodblues December 20, 2012 at 01:28 am
I like to think that, if Harry had died under the ice, leaving George to fulfill his dreams, then the Japanese pilot whom Harry shot down might perhaps take out the Enola Gay, allowing tens of thousands of innocent Japanese civilians to live on in Hiroshima, ultimately overthrowing the Emperor. Japan, now NOT devestated and, thus, rebuilt in the 50's, does not displace America as a manufacturing powerhouse.
Meanwhile, George discovers a cure for cancer in Borneo, the powerful Potter convinces the Republican Party to be realistic well into the late 1990's, and old drunken uncle does not become a role model first for the S & L warmup of the late 80s, then a full-on idol for banking in 2009. And Donna Reid keeps the milf glasses and goes on to promote a 'Save the TaTas' program years earlier, saving countless thousands of women. Harry Bailey, anti-christ. see him this Friday, 12-21-12, when the world ends. Betcha he had something to do with the Mayan downfall, Jamestown, and Dick Cheney...but I've no proof.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Deborah Bell (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy these boards a lot.
CowDung June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
The trouble is, that once the 'boards' are off the front page, one can't follow the discussion. TheRead More 'shout stream' has gone away with the redesign of Patch. The 'reply' feature has also gone. Somehow I don't see these boards as being all that useful for public discussion and interaction. The more effective place is on the articles themselves--they get more page space, and they tend to have a more 'discussion friendly' topic for conversation than the random board postings.
Karen Egert June 18, 2013 at 06:06 pm
I agree -- they should have a separate tab for Letters to the Editor
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Apparently Mr. Common Sense you were not at the Board meeting because if you were you would knowRead More that it was clearly outlined that all decisions and reporting of this police officer will be from the police department -- not the school. So are you saying that Lucy Biegler is now the new spokeswoman ? You said she is calling out the position for what it REALLY is ? The discrepancy in outlined roles and the vagueness of this position is reason enough to question it. Ofcourse you have an opinion , but because our children will be directly affected I think our concerns should be heavily weighed . .
karen egert June 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Rob -- to answer your question , I was never crazy about the DARE program and yes , I was disturbedRead More that the officer carrying a gun in school . I didn't like it . So I am being consistent. I was new to the school at the time .
A.John Blake June 19, 2013 at 06:22 am
I have no problem with a policeman in school. His ability to carry a gun is no different on schoolRead More property than elsewhere. Let us make sure we all understand that the man is a policeman, not a counselor. I think the idea that the children will be safer is absurd. Cameras in every public area in every school, monitored by the police ,would probably provide better surveillance. I object to any understanding between the Board and the Town which creates a hybrid officer who is required to act differently in school than he does on the street. In the past, the police have been hobbled by "arrangements" between the then BOE and the Town that the police would not enter the schools without permission. Investigations would not be conducted until the Board had finished its investigation. A "safe haven" had been created. This is wrong. In school, the children knew they didn't have to worry about police and acted accordingly. This is wrong. If the people want a policeman in school, let him be a policeman. Let him act as he does on the street. He is not a trained counselor . Don't think he will solve children's problems. At the moment, I don't think the entire picture has been given to us. I cannot believe there is not some writing between Dr.Dolan and the WPD which outlines the authority of each towards one another and over the SRO. I don't believe the BOE is about to allow the " fox into the hen house" without promises that restrict the policeman. I oppose any restriction of a policeman in the performance of his duty. I do not want to see the return of the "arrangements" of the past. The BOE and the Town must provide us with the full agreement or we should dismiss the thought of a SRO.
Charles Sullivan June 12, 2013 at 05:28 pm
Maddy, Thank you for your comment and I agree that's a lot of money. I just wanted to let you knowRead More that I wanted to give the board some options to consider in case they felt the need to hire a hybrid public safety officer with experience in security operations. Does the town need one, maybe. Can the WPD do more in regards to daily school security, yes I think so but they don't have to assign a cop they already have on the books for this activity. Thank you again for time.
New perspective June 13, 2013 at 02:45 pm
Mr. Sullivan - thank you for your lengthy explanation and detail. I think one of the statements youRead More made should speak volumes to all "Resource officers are proactive, and they can stop something before it starts, Police Officers are re-active and they respond to locations to enforce the law." Do we really want an armed officer in the school who MAY react to let's say someone who has a watergun but the police officer *thinks* it is a real gun at first quick glance? This happens everyday thoughout this country all by accident. Do we really need WHS to be another statistic? Here's another question....why just have an SRO at the High School? Aren't the middle school aged children MORE prone to peer pressure and stress that can cause them to want to harm others as a reaction? In my Non-Professional opinion, middle school aged kids are more of a danger than High School kids.
John Q. Public June 14, 2013 at 11:17 am
Mr. Sullivan, I believe I read that the SRO position had been eliminated for budgetary reasons inRead More the past but that doesn't really address the first issue I mentioned, nor does your comment about having external foot patrols. (As an aside, I believe the crossing guard in the morning at the corner where the auditorium is is a regular sworn police officer). In addition, I see the presence or lack of such external patrols and the lack of coverage if a single SRO has a sick day as logistical issues that can be worked out as opposed to legitimate objections. I don't really see these as evidence going against the SRO concept.
concerned citizen June 11, 2013 at 08:03 pm
Egert is just against guns, that's it. Everything has to fit into this, her small world, and sheRead More tries hard to make it fit, squeezes it, bends it and massages it. She gets help from the elitist billionaire Nanny Bloomberg for the talking points, but he has none regarding this specific topic, so she flounders.
john June 11, 2013 at 10:28 pm
Karen, karen, karen. it is to easy. never mind.
karen egert June 15, 2013 at 10:28 pm
GGG - I have nothing against the Westfield police . On the contrary, on the few occasions I hadRead More interactions with any of them., they were all professional , courteous and very helpful . I am grateful for our Westfield police . I believe that the wonderful job they do as trained police officers is spectacular . I just disagree with the use of a police officer that has only been trained in the duties of an SRO for 7 to 10 days to be the ones counseling our children. . But please don't say I'm against police officers . That's inaccurate and unfair .