I have lived in Westfield for over 18 years, and have loved every moment of it. Graduating Westfield High School a couple of years ago, I got a unique view of the town, that many people in town cannot relate to. I appreciate beautiful Westfield downtown more and more, as my friends from other towns/colleges see Westfield for the first time and they are amazed. Always the first thing out of otheir mouth is "wow, your downtown is amazing."
I take pride in living here, but I am confused on what goes on in the back of Starbucks. Do people realize that most of the kids that hang out back there are the same ones getting in trouble and causing problems in the town? I do not have a problem if you want to hang out behind a store with your friends, but in my opinion this idea completely changes when there are 10 people laying behind a store and basically making it their home. The area behind Starbucks has become a place that people basically go to, to get away from their households, to lay all over the concrete and throw cigarette butts around. It's pretty disgusting and is not a good look for a town with such pride. These people literally make the back of Starbucks their home.
Basically, what I am saying is everytime I walk out of there I feel like I am walking through a slum. I smell like cigarettes and I am surrounded by many people that are laying all over the floor and littering the parking lot. With so many upstanding rules in our town to preserve the nature of it, why do we allow this to happen?

Elena
8:42 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012
The sarcasm in the comment is uncalled for. Grow up. My two cents.
Elena
9:59 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Hershey, you're a kid, aren't you? you sounded like my 10-year old's social science essay. I'm not about to start an internet argument with a minor. lol
Jim
6:45 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
There is a particularly high occurrence of quality of life crimes taking place behind Starbucks and I believe that the WPD is aware of that. This has been something that has been going on for years. If the kids are not breaking any laws then let them be, but if they are they should be held responsible for their actions, no matter where in town they are. I don't believe they add to the town's "character" but the situation has vastly improved from where it was several years ago. I believe the real issue area is now in front of Qdoba. There are often teenagers loitering outside the restaurant with bikes and skateboards (which are not allowed on downtown sidewalks), smoking cigarettes, yelling profanities, making out, etc. I would definitely like to see the management of that venue step up and have the kids move along and if all else fails, I think there should be a better police foot patrol presence downtown.
Sally McBride
8:06 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
you can no longer have a loitering law in NJ:
Why are loitering laws illegal in New Jersey?
Fortunately, loitering ordinances are, except in a few narrow cases, invalid in New Jersey because the Legislature, when enacting the Criminal Code in 1979, specifically decided to not include those types of prohibitions within the Code out of concern that “vagrancy and loitering statutes have long suffered from constitutional infirmity and have been criticized as inviting official harassment and discriminatory enforcement.” See State v. Crawley, 90 N.J. 241, 247 (1982). It follows, therefore, that no municipality is allowed to locally prohibit loitering and vagrancy when the Legislature has decided to decriminalize them. Id. at 251.
http://www.lpcnj.org/OGTF/Loiter.html
Jeff
9:59 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
behind starbucks is a very sketchy place. i know kids that do drugs back there and literally sleep there over night
Brian
11:49 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
There is clearly a "No Loitering" sign posted back there. Westfield Police Department, please enforce.
Codyblue
11:57 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
I would like them to start giving out tickets to all the soccer moms in their huge GMC Suburbans and the like that bully around town in their tanks, (that most of them can hardly drive anyway.....they look like small mice behind the wheel)...chatting on their cell phones like they are home in their kitchens. I see at least 6-8 women a day talking on their cell, some even texting at red lights.....Hello....they are an accident waiting to happen and I have never seen anyone being pulled over and cited. Please...correct me if I am wrong. I'd like to have a $50 bill for every violator I see.
Jeff
12:18 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
we should have some westfield police atleast walking around downtown on occasion especially behind starbucks
JERSEY GIRL
12:38 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
The loitering has been going on for years- but i think the issue is what kids are allowed to loiter. Back in 2006-2007, I know of a group of males that were minority and would hang out back there, PD would bring them in and call the parents due to their "loitering". I guess wearing black eyeliner and black trench makes it acceptable. I feel it is intimidating to walk through that lot, with young adults standing in the street, leaning against cars, just hanging out, when you have spent money at the theatre or a store, It should not be tolerated.
I also feel the town needs to enforce the drivers who refuse to stop in crosswalks for pedestrians and those who talk on the cell while driving, Honestly, you cant go through town without seeing at least 3 or more soccer moms talking on their cells while driving. And how about the cars that refuse to stop in the am in front of the armory on Rahway ave- to let students cross. Cant we get an officer out there in Sept?
Jeff
1:31 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
completely agree with everything you said jersey girl
JERSEY GIRL
2:05 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Note to Henry Hershey, what makes you think that all the people loitering are Westfield residents?
E Liz
8:51 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
There is definitely a 'no loitering' sign back there - personally I have never seen it enforced. Also - I have gone to my car after an appointment downtown and had four people leaning on my car - I had to ask them to move, and they did, but one stared at me and blew cigarette smoke in my face. When I got home, I realized that they had been extinguishing cigarette butts on my car door. I have stopped using that lot in the evening hours and if I can't get a street spot, I park behind Barons. Also, the owner of Galleria West (the framing place which used to be where Anthology is now) told me that the reason for his move to Quimby was because of the repeated vandalism to the back of his store and his morning ritual of having to clean back there. It is a quality of life issue - the original letter is absolutely correct - Westfielders are proud of their town, proud of their downtown but the back of Starbucks is our dirty little secret. I have heard hearsay of worse offenses taking place back there - but I have not seen them first hand. What I have witnessed firsthand - the disrespect for people and property needs to be addressed. It seems like if the no-loitering sign is actually referencing an ordinance, the police can get involved. Also - I think Starbucks would have something to say - but I have seen some of their employees are part of that group. We were all teenagers once, and we all "hung out" somewhere, but these kids are incredibly disrespectful.
Mocha Grande
11:19 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
The Downtown Westfield Corporation (DWC) needs to supplement the hiring of a police officer to patrol this area at night as they did years ago. The police department has approximately 9 less police officers now as it did then and can no longer spread its authority to these types of quality of life issues. Many of these kids hanging out behind Starbucks are from adjacent communities and come to Westfield because the police in their town do not tolerate their delinquency nor do they have a "downtown" as Westfield does.
Southide W
12:32 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
I think parents need to be more responsible with overseeing and monitoring their children's whereabouts and not relying on the community at large to babysit them.
Wally Westfield
11:45 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
excellent post Mocha, it raises the question as to why hasn't the DWC hasn't been previously involved if all that has been posted is true, which there is no reason to doubt that it is.
JERSEY GIRL
12:08 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
I think another issue, could be, not what you know but who you know. No one really cares until they are personally effected.
I shouldnt feel weird about picking up my pre teen daughter behind the theatre, near Windmill, after a movie in the evening and have to deal with a group of 20 somethings in the parking lot near starbucks. That shouldnt be allowed and i dont think Garwood would put up with it.
E Liz
2:33 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
@ South Westfielder -
These are not juveniles. Some of them look to be in their mid-20s. Sure, maybe their parents could have done a better job bringing them up, but these are grown ups we are talking about.
Southide W
2:43 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
As often as I have been in town, I can say that I have seen ages from 12-18, maybe 19. Mid-20's? I don't think so. Maybe they looked like they were that old, but there are more happenin' places than the back of Starbucks for people that old.